condition or have a desire to merge with Canada. State that the
president was being sarcastic about Canada being a 51st state.
I think we need to call our congress members to have them put a congressional resolution stating that the United States is in no
condition or have a desire to merge with Canada. State that the
president was being sarcastic about Canada being a 51st state.
Tempering Canadian rancor should be the first step.
condition or have a desire to merge with Canada. State that the
president was being sarcastic about Canada being a 51st state.
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too,
and yet here we are.
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too,Integrating 34 million people, currencies, and governments would be much harder. I am trying to be one small fry to ask all Americans to call
and yet here we are.
their congress members to tell them to start a resolution against a
merger. Canada merging might end up leaning to the Republicans NEVER in power. It would be like adding another California to the electral
college.
Matthew Munson wrote to DUMAS WALKER <=-
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too, and yet here we are.
Integrating 34 million people, currencies, and governments would be
much harder. I am trying to be one small fry to ask all Americans to
call their congress members to tell them to start a resolution against
a merger. Canada merging might end up leaning to the Republicans NEVER
in power. It would be like adding another California to the electral college.
America is broke.
apparently they dont have a sense of humor, nor do they understand that we do not want canada. we have enough problems.
would be like adding another California to the electral college.
exactly. a lot of people in canada are getting a free ride and would be democrat voters.
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too, and yet here we are.
do you really think trump is going to take canada, though?
also geographic renaming is not uncommon.
futhermore, nobody died when it was renamed the gulf of america.
Integrating 34 million people, currencies, and governments would be much harder. I am trying to be one small fry to ask all Americans to call
their congress members to tell them to start a resolution against a
merger. Canada merging might end up leaning to the Republicans NEVER in power. It would be like adding another California to the electral
college.
America is broke.
do you really think trump is going to take canada, though?
also geographic renaming is not uncommon.
futhermore, nobody died when it was renamed the gulf of america.
But it was stupid, especially since they are supposedly so all about
cutting government waste. Changing names of stuff, and being strict about adhearance to the change, is expensive and a waste.
Canada literally stinks of Liberalism (Democrat). I on the other hand would probably vote Rebublican, but up here if I said that I'd be annihilated expecially on social media. :-)
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too,
and yet here we are.
Re: Congressional Resolution
By: Dumas Walker to MATTHEW MUNSON on Sun Mar 09 2025 09:00 am
I thought he was being sarcastic about renaming the Gulf of Mexico, too, and yet here we are.
It should be named Gulf of No-one on the Epstein list has been arrested yet.
But it was stupid, especially since they are supposedly so all about cutting government waste. Changing names of stuff, and being strict about adhearance to the change, is expensive and a waste.
Why do you think it was stupid? There are geographic renamings every day.
How is it expensive and a waste? Wow much did it hurt the american people? honestly is it any different than declaring it '(subject) day'?
fBecause they are enforcing strict adhearance, that means someone... developers, administrative employees, etc... had to go through every bit
hangecode, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.
are you sure about that? is there a law that they have to adhere to the
do they have to drop what they are doing right now and make the change now,r
just do it when there's many more changes due?
code, maps, signs, weather report templates, and anything else with that name and change it.
are you sure about that? is there a law that they have to adhere to thehange
Trump's press secretary said that all government offices would be adhering to the change. I am as sure as she is.
Per what the press secretary said, it sounded like a drop everything and do it.
Sysop: | Greg Meckel |
---|---|
Location: | Anchorage, AK |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 71:09:01 |
Calls: | 109 |
Files: | 1,456 |
Messages: | 15,264 |
Sysop: | Greg Meckel |
---|---|
Location: | Anchorage, AK |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 71:09:01 |
Calls: | 109 |
Files: | 1,456 |
Messages: | 15,264 |